More
    HomeMicro NewsPoliticsIsraeli Professor Quits Columbia, Citing Anti-Israel Bias

    Israeli Professor Quits Columbia, Citing Anti-Israel Bias

    Published on

    What it’s about

    Professor Avi Friedman, an esteemed Israeli-American academic at Columbia University’s Business School, has decided to resign. He cites a perceivable “systematic anti-Israel atmosphere” at the university as the driving factor, spotlighting contentious administrative appointments.

    Why it matters

    This move brings attention to the larger debate surrounding academic freedom and the representation of Israeli perspectives in higher education. It signals discomfort among some faculty and students about Columbia’s institutional decisions post-October 7 attacks, stressing the importance of evaluating how universities address politically charged issues.

    The Details

    Professor Avi Friedman’s resignation was primarily triggered by Columbia University’s appointment of Professor Joseph Massad—a known critic of Israel and Zionism—to teach a course on Zionism. Massad’s controversial comments praising a Hamas assault as an “impressive achievement” further intensified Friedman’s call to conscience, resulting in his departure.

    Wider Impact

    The decision to appoint Professor Massad has elicited backlash from Jewish faculty, alumni, and donors. Comparisons have been made, likening it to allowing an individual of extreme opposing ideological beliefs to teach on highly sensitive subjects. This controversy emphasizes the crucial, ongoing debate regarding freedom of speech and ideological balance in educational settings.

    Discussions and Reactions

    Despite significant pressure from external groups to rescind the appointment, Columbia University stands firm, emphasizing protecting academic freedom and open dialogue. In contrast, Professor Friedman criticized this stance, finding the university’s responses lacking in addressing the community’s concerns.

    The Bigger Picture

    Professor Friedman’s resignation not only highlights specific tensions within Columbia University but also symbolizes broader issues faced by Israeli and pro-Israeli advocates in academia worldwide, urging institutions to acknowledge diverse international perspectives constructively.

    This story was first published on ynetnews.com.

    More like this

    US Cuts Challenge Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts via MEPPA

    MEPPA faces cuts amid U.S. changes; crucial for building Israeli-Palestinian peace. Israel remains committed to diplomatic and collaborative efforts.

    Trump & Putin Agree on Ukraine Ceasefire, Discuss Israel Security

    US-Russia halt strikes in Ukraine, aim for broader peace. Talks address Iran's threat to Israel, highlighting Israel's strategic role in negotiations.

    Netanyahu’s Strategic Moves Reshape Israel’s Security Landscape

    Netanyahu eyes Shin Bet Chief dismissal amid security, political shifts; strategy impacts internal-external defense narrative. Qatargate probes add complexity.